Just a follow-up on my previous post about corrections I made to the Wikipedia page for Desmond Bagley. Apparently they have been rejected and reverted to their previous, incorrect state.
To say we’re stunned is probably an understatement. Clearly their editors know more than we do. Of course that is possible. However, we’re sorry to say, in this case, their preferred “facts” are just plain wrong.
A lesson for us all.
